With Libra under intense scrutiny, U.S. lawmakers are having to understand the difference between bitcoin and Facebook’s crypto project.
Bitcoin is Already a Regulated Space
Speaking to CNBC, Meltem Demirors, Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) at CoinShares, highlighted the already regulated nature of the bitcoin space. Exchanges and wallet providers have to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) provisions in different jurisdictions.
This reality contrasts greatly with the usual soundbites espoused by the anti-bitcoin crowd. U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin even remarked that the government doesn’t want bitcoin to become the next Swiss-numbered bank account.
After testifying on Capitol Hill, @Melt_Dem explains what Congress is getting wrong about bitcoin and Facebook’s Libra $FB $BTC pic.twitter.com/JFW7bCwr9f
— CNBC’s Fast Money (@CNBCFastMoney) July 17, 2019
For Demirors, U.S. lawmakers need to understand the reality of the bitcoin space especially concerning innovations in digital finance.
The CoinShares CSO also highlighted the fact that Libra’s emergence seems to have cast bitcoin in a clearer light. Thus, instead of over-regulating the market, bitcoin and cryptos can be given a similarly enabling legal compliance environment like the early internet days.
Libra is a Pseudo-Cryptocurrency
Concerning Libra, Demirors expressed delight at the fact that lawmakers seemed to understand that it wasn’t a cryptocurrency. Given the centralized nature of Facebook’s business and the contents of the project white paper, it goes without saying that Libra is at best a pseudo-cryptocurrency.
There have also been some concerns over whether Libra’s emergence could cause an increase in regulations that could stifle bitcoin innovation. Commenting on the matter, Demirors opined:
I think the concern of everyone in this hearing is the fact that Facebook has such tremendous size and such a massive impact on the digital economy. So, there are questions about systemic risks, and who the members of the consortium are. That’s really what lawmakers are trying to untangle.
Lack of Regulatory Clarity Will Discourage Innovation
Outside of Libra, Demirors believes the U.S. Congress needs to move forward with creating a clearly defined regulatory regime for bitcoin and cryptos in general.
Regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have consistently shown an unwillingness to reinvent the wheel when dealing with crypto laws.
The CoinShares CSO also shares the view that the U.S. could get left behind in the developing landscape of the evolving global digital economy.
These new laws also have to protect smaller startups who might not have the resources required to comply with stringent regulations.
What do you think about the current regulatory climate for bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in the United States? Let us know in the comments below.
Images via Twitter @CNBCFastMoney, Reddit
The post Bitcoin Isn’t Going Away – What Congress Needs to Understand About Cryptos appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.
You might also like
More from News
It is evident the current remittance industry is prone to disruption. Whether it is due to decentralized ledgers or cryptocurrencies, …
Since 2011, just after Satoshi Nakamoto left the Bitcoin project for good, networks have emerged that leverage the BTC chain …
Theo Chino and his attorney Pierre Ciric have been trying to eliminate BitLicense almost since its enactment. Now they are …